11.1 -> 11.2 upgrade problems
John DeSoi (7/2/08 12:46AM)
John DeSoi (7/2/08 8:04AM)
Maurice Inzirillo 4DNC (7/2/08 2:36PM)
John DeSoi (7/2/08 12:46 AM)
I have a pretty simple application I upgraded to 11.2 where I have
noticed a number of problems I was not having with 11.1.
To start, 11.2 did not recognize any of my previous preferences. I had
to reset method colors and just about every setting in preferences.
My runtime volume build with no changes other than the 11.2 upgrade no
longer knows about all the words I saved in the dictionary during
spell checking.
A procedure that worked in 11.1 now sometimes reports that a record is
locked, but if you check LOCKED ATTRIBUTES in the same method all the
values are empty.
The worst problem is that the Sum function returns an incorrect value
when called from a form method or object script. It finally dawned on
me it was summing all the selected record values except for the
current record. Here are two traces of the same code, one called from
a form method and the other called from a method run in a new process:
-------------- next part --------------
Here the current record value amount is 50, but Sum returns zero.
-------------- next part --------------
4D reports both the structure and data are OK.
Anyone else having these problems, or just me?
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
John DeSoi (7/2/08 8:04 AM)
I have a pretty simple application I upgraded to 11.2 where I have
noticed a number of problems I was not having with 11.1.
To start, 11.2 did not recognize any of my previous preferences. I had
to reset method colors and just about every setting in preferences.
My runtime volume build with no changes other than the 11.2 upgrade no
longer knows about all the words I saved in the dictionary during
spell checking.
A procedure that worked in 11.1 now sometimes reports that a record is
locked, but if you check LOCKED ATTRIBUTES in the same method all the
values are empty.
The worst problem is that the Sum function returns an incorrect value
when called from a form method or object script. It finally dawned on
me it was summing all the selected record values except for the
current record. For example, with one record selected, the debugger
shows [Expense]Amount = 50, but Sum([Expense]Amount) = 0. I get the
correct values with the same code and records if I call it from a
separate method in a new process.
4D reports both the structure and data are OK.
Anyone else having these problems, or just me?
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
Maurice Inzirillo 4DNC (7/2/08 2:36 PM)
Hi John,
With release 2, the local preferences folders have changed.
see the addendum 11.2 page 45 :
http://www.4d.com/support/documentation.html
HTH
Le 2 juil. 08 ý 14:04, John DeSoi a Ècrit :
I have a pretty simple application I upgraded to 11.2 where I have
noticed a number of problems I was not having with 11.1.
To start, 11.2 did not recognize any of my previous preferences. I
had to reset method colors and just about every setting in
preferences.
My runtime volume build with no changes other than the 11.2 upgrade
no longer knows about all the words I saved in the dictionary during
spell checking.
A procedure that worked in 11.1 now sometimes reports that a record
is locked, but if you check LOCKED ATTRIBUTES in the same method all
the values are empty.
The worst problem is that the Sum function returns an incorrect
value when called from a form method or object script. It finally
dawned on me it was summing all the selected record values except
for the current record. For example, with one record selected, the
debugger shows [Expense]Amount = 50, but Sum([Expense]Amount) = 0. I
get the correct values with the same code and records if I call it
from a separate method in a new process.
4D reports both the structure and data are OK.
Anyone else having these problems, or just me?
Best regards,
Maurice Inzirillo
--
4D NET Center S.A.
4DBK 3.1 : www.4dbk.com
Internet 4D Hosting : www.4dnetcenter.com
Phone : +41 (0)32 342 27 32
email : maurice.inzirillo@...
iChat : maurice_inzirillo@...
Skype : maurice.inzirillo
Reply to this message
Summary created 7/2/08 at 9:21AM by Intellex Corporation
Comments welcome at: feedback@intellexcorp.com