Selected record number in v11.2?
Spencer Hinsdale (7/10/08 11:17AM)
Matt Houghton-Thompson (7/10/08 1:43PM)
Matt Houghton-Thompson (7/14/08 1:38PM)
Spencer Hinsdale (7/10/08 11:17 AM)
On 7/10/08 10:43 AM, "Matt Houghton-Thompson" <mattht4dnug@...
wrote:
It is related to a "CUT NAMED SELECTION"..."USE NAMED SELECTION" block
of code in an On Load event. I moved these two commands to my test
code and now see the problem. This seems like a bug!
Are you using POP RECORD?
-spencer
Matt Houghton-Thompson (7/10/08 1:43 PM)
<7cc88da10807101043p7946966ucb33b040ff033a7d@...
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Matt Houghton-Thompson
<mattht4dnug@... wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Peter Jakobsson
<lists@... wrote:
Can you reproduce it outside of the context of it's current code
environment
?
No, definitely seems to be specific to my application.
It is related to a "CUT NAMED SELECTION"..."USE NAMED SELECTION" block
of code in an On Load event. I moved these two commands to my test
code and now see the problem. This seems like a bug!
-Matt
Matt Houghton-Thompson (7/14/08 1:38 PM)
<7cc88da10807141038q25ad510evd93834e1733787f3@...
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Spencer Hinsdale
<hinsdale@... wrote:
It is related to a "CUT NAMED SELECTION"..."USE NAMED SELECTION" block
of code in an On Load event. I moved these two commands to my test
code and now see the problem. This seems like a bug!
Are you using POP RECORD?
No, if I move the code to a separate process I have the same problem.
I think something is weird with the structure itself. Creating a new
datafile does not make the problem go away, where as moving the code
to a new structure does make it go away.
-Matt H-T.
Reply to this message
Summary created 7/14/08 at 4:27PM by Intellex Corporation
Comments welcome at: feedback@intellexcorp.com